Why Statistics/Evidence Is FAKE

download: https://pomf2.lain.la/f/wjvvhz7.mp4
my links: https://skibidicoffee.neocities.org/links
my site: https://skibidicoffee.neocities.org
my links: https://skibidicoffee.neocities.org/links
my site: https://skibidicoffee.neocities.org
Category:
Tags:


7 ratings
178 views

Want to add this video to your favorites?
Sign in to VidLii now!
Sign in to VidLii now!
Want to add this video to your playlists?
Sign in to VidLii now!
Sign in to VidLii now!
Want to flag this video?
Sign in to VidLii now!
Sign in to VidLii now!

0



Most statistics and evidence aren't fake, as they originate from surveys and investigations done by professionals with the purpose of study and perservation, it's literally impossible to fake something like that since other organizations can deny the statistics by doing their own, or people themselves, therefore destroying the reputation of the organization responsible, not everyone is SCHIZOPHRENIC nor have HALLUCATIONS, your conclusions are meaningless, YOU FUCKING GEN Z SNOWFLAKE.

0



@DONTMAKEMEPUKE even if your smart and im stupid why waste your time and energy on me? like ive seen tons of people i disagree with online yet i just avoid them i dont waste my time debating them. even if your right why do you wanna waste your time thinking about me and trying to debate me? it doesnt make sense

0



@SkibidiCoffee Humillate your generation, most of it doesn't have enough neurons to be intelligent.

2



I agree with you but I draw a different conclusion. Yes, we can never 100% prove without a doubt that something is real. However, just because something isn't 100% proven doesn't mean we should discount it, instead, we should presume that the claim with the most evidence, data, etc. is true (with exceptions)

-1



@gutetama2 @cidoku @shingo point of this wasnt to say dont believe anything its just that nothing can be proved 100% with evidence so everything requires blind trust and any "intellectuals" who use statistics in their politicial debates ignore this that the ways to measure statistics will always be flawed. this is why in my debates i just use my brain and thinking and common sense and some well known examples instead of just foaming my mouth at statistics and data
(edited)

3



@SkibidiCoffee You can only prove things with 100% confidence in a formal system, and, as far as we know, the world isn't one. Our knowledge is inherently limited, so OBVIOUSLY there's always a degree of uncertainty present and hence faith is required. For example, that's why statistics have to sample populations: as the randomness of the sample increases, it becomes increasingly indistinguishable from the real thing. Yes, sometimes samples are manipulated for ideological gain, but that doesn't mean that sampling is wrong. Our lack of omniscience forces us to always have to make compromises. Oh, and BTW, your "brain and thinking and common sense" are also flawed and limited.
(edited)

5



What radical skepticism does to a mofo. This is nothing new; for example, Descartes conjured the idea, among others, that there may have been an evil demon trying to deceive him such that his reality was a complete illusion. But what do you gain from doubting everything? Life is more creative and prosperous when you choose to believe things.
Date: |
Views: 178 | Ratings: 7 |
Time: | Comments: 25 | Favorites: 0 |