Canada, USA, Mexico 11
Age: 25
BirdChirp: https://birdchirp.net/u/Cum11
Your local Vietnamese retard
Real street niggaš„·šæš«šµ
Anarchist (ancap :3)
Greater Texas and independence
Your local Vietnamese retard
Real street niggaš„·šæš«šµ
Anarchist (ancap :3)
Greater Texas and independence
Country: United States
Occupation: Dumbass
Schools: Gayle university
Interests: Politics, TV, music, vidja games
Movies: First Sunday, Godzilla: minus one, Adam Sandler
Music: Nu metal, Prog metal, Post metal, Doom metal, Incelcore, rap, etc.
Books: How foolish of you to assume I read
https://birdchirp.net/u/Cum11
CUM11
Yall might like ts
Subscribers (79)
Friends (10)
Subscriptions (14)
Videos (212)
Favorites (27)
Playlists
Recent Activity
![]() |
CUM11 commented on a video (1 day ago) Canāt get even get laid in my dre...
@TheSpoilsofWrath I rarely remember my dreams, most of the time I just remember one or two details. |
|
![]() |
CUM11 My California liberal friend will accept any random person if they come out as transgender but he just can!t seem to accept me being a transracial Vietnamese person! (2 days ago) | |
![]() |
CUM11 Idk why leftists hate rfk jr so much considering how much he glazes Europe (3 days ago) | |
![]() |
CUM11 commented on a video (3 days ago) People Do Not Conspire
And the goy of the year award goes to you!!!!! |
|
![]() |
CUM11 commented on a video (3 days ago) New Pickups!!!
Go for it, stream on rumble |
Channel Comments (200)
SkibidiCoffee (3 days ago)
I watched some videos about anarchism recently. Although about the leftist kind.
And it kinda makes more sense then I assumed.
It's not that anarchists hate all government. It's mostly just the idea of politicians and a ruling class with a police that they don't like. Even if they are elected.
But like anarchism. Would be like a community where all the members make decisions directly and be police officers and soldiers together to fight war or crime. No one's above anyone in power.
And it kinda makes more sense then I assumed.
It's not that anarchists hate all government. It's mostly just the idea of politicians and a ruling class with a police that they don't like. Even if they are elected.
But like anarchism. Would be like a community where all the members make decisions directly and be police officers and soldiers together to fight war or crime. No one's above anyone in power.
SkibidiCoffee (5 days ago)
Also as for leaving. Sure it's hard to escape a state. But you can escape Personal income tax or corporate by moving to UAE or Saudi Arabia. And also some British overseas islands also act as tax loopholes as well for residents and companies setup there.
For violence monopoly. There's countries where it's illegal for police officers to have a gun on them like new Zealand
Countries without their own military like Iceland or Grenada.
And many many nations also banned the death penalty.
For violence monopoly. There's countries where it's illegal for police officers to have a gun on them like new Zealand
Countries without their own military like Iceland or Grenada.
And many many nations also banned the death penalty.
SkibidiCoffee (5 days ago)
Ok. I mean worldwide anarchy would kinda have to exist. I don't see china or Russia or Israel or USA or UK or India/Pakistan ever letting anarchy happen without their meddling to disrupt it. So those nations would need to be destroyed first somehow for anarchy to function.
Also my point is just that. If the criteria that makes ancapistan not a state is that they let you leave. Most nations today also fit your definition.
Also my point is just that. If the criteria that makes ancapistan not a state is that they let you leave. Most nations today also fit your definition.
CUM11 (5 days ago)
Itās anarchy, if you donāt like it then you can go somewhere else with a government or start your own. The goal isnāt worldwide anarchy, thatās too unrealistic, the goal is just a few anarchist societies. Also no, you cannot leave statism, you can leave a poor state for a wealthier one or an authoritarian state for a slightly more libertarian state, but you can never avoid the state.
SkibidiCoffee (6 days ago)
also. how tf do you make sure villages are following the principles of anarchy. who would be the one to monitor every village to see if they allow deportations for tax evaders or not. and then punish them for not cooperating with the plan? every village will inevitably be different to each other. so whos gonna force every town and city to be 100% perfect anarchism and punish people who refuse anarchism
SkibidiCoffee (6 days ago)
like you would end up creating a new military or police anyway to stop attempts at destroying your ideology by people who disagree with it. so whats the point of even trying for the ideology if you will have to get rid of the main goal to preserve it anyway to keep out nazis and communists and ISIS from the world by slaughtering them before they attack you.
SkibidiCoffee (6 days ago)
also this doesnt answer the question. what happens if someone doesnt want to be anarchist. im not talking about invasion. i mean in an anarchist world. who is going to stop me if i set up a neonazi or communist city in the woods?
like thats my point. anarchism can never be worldwide unless 100% of humans support it.
someone will always just run off and create their own places with nonanarchist beliefs. and when they gain alot of resources. they will inevitably attack the anarchist villages.
like thats my point. anarchism can never be worldwide unless 100% of humans support it.
someone will always just run off and create their own places with nonanarchist beliefs. and when they gain alot of resources. they will inevitably attack the anarchist villages.
SkibidiCoffee (6 days ago)
@cum11 thats the same with modern nations if the difference between property and government is violence and taxes.
most countries besides north korea. the average citizen is able to leave. it just takes time and money but they arent banned from leaving if they dont like taxes or violence.
so using your definition. USA. russia.china are all anarchist nations since they dont make it illegal for their citizens to leave the land or denounce their citizenship entirely.
most countries besides north korea. the average citizen is able to leave. it just takes time and money but they arent banned from leaving if they dont like taxes or violence.
so using your definition. USA. russia.china are all anarchist nations since they dont make it illegal for their citizens to leave the land or denounce their citizenship entirely.
CUM11 (6 days ago)
@skibidicoffee Naturally if you voluntarily choose to be on someone elseās land, then you must abide by their rules, otherwise you are violating the agreement you made with that person in order to gain access to their land and thus they have every right to forcefully remove you from their land.
CUM11 (6 days ago)
@skibidicoffee Do not listen to ancoms, their ādefinitionā of anarchy is physically impossible. So the real definition of anarchy, as stated by the Merriam Webster dictionary is āabsence of government.ā The reason why a privately owned city, piece of land, building, or house isnāt a government is because the owners of that land donāt forcefully take your money and have a monopoly on violence. You can choose to pay for access of the land or any amenities on that land or you can not trespass.
Please log in to post a comment!

Send Message
Add Comment
Share Channel
Block User
Add as Friend







































